You improve your texting by analyzing your own conversations, not others'
Fabrizio Rausa uses a sports analogy to make this point: watching every Michael Jordan shot in history will not teach you how to shoot. You have to shoot yourself, analyze what went wrong, make small adjustments, and repeat. The same logic applies to texting. Studying other people's examples is useful context, but real improvement only comes from reviewing your own actual conversations. His Discord has a dedicated channel where members post their own text exchanges, reflect on what they did wrong first, and then receive feedback. The self-reflection step before asking for input is non-negotiable.
Go deeper with Fabrizio Rausa
Ask anything about this, and Fabrizio Rausa answers from everything they've shared.
More to learn
See everything in Learn
Less is always more with texting, but dropping the date ask too early also fails
When in doubt, text her less. Less is always more with women. That said, going too far in the other direction and just suddenly hammering her with a date request out of nowhere is also the wrong move. You need to weave the date naturally in
MembersMake bold assumptions instead of giving simpy compliments when she shares something
When a woman shares something fun or personal, like her favorite song or what she has been up to, the wrong move is to use it as an excuse to tell her you will call her more often or that you find it cute. That is textbook simp behavior wit
Putting a price tag on your attention is the core texting principle
The fundamental problem with nice-guy or simp texting is that you give your attention away for free with no conditions attached. Your attention needs to have a price tag on it. You talk to her to advance to a date, and you do that by painti