Why 95% of generative AI pilots fail, according to MIT
The industry rushed to apply AI everywhere without being selective, leading to token maxing and hallucinations. MIT research found that 95% of generative AI pilots fail. The lesson the industry is now learning is that you have to be very selective about where you apply this intelligence, and equally selective about how you design the new stack for that intelligence to play out.
Go deeper with Greg Isenberg
Ask anything about this, and Greg Isenberg answers from everything they've shared.
More to learn
See everything in Learn
MembersHaving an 'AI center of excellence' is not enough — a radical reset is required
The assumption most companies are operating under is that they're doing some things with AI — they have an AI center of excellence, maybe an AI feature — and that's sufficient. It's not. The wake-up call from investors to their portfolio co
VC memo parable: the knife salesman who bet everything on Google AdWords in 2003
A benchmark partner sent a wake-up call memo to portfolio companies urging them to radically rethink how they operate with AI — immediately. The memo ended with a parable: imagine two friends in roughly 2003, both selling knives door to doo
Why every enterprise CEO is writing $100M AI checks right now
The game theory for large company incumbents is brutally simple: the CEO's choice is either pay a massive check — say $100 million or more — to an AI consulting or transformation firm, risk wasting the money, and maybe get fired over it, or